This set of web pages offers a brief outline of key topics and
issues in Social Policy. The Internet is an international medium, and
although there are
several pages about social policy in the UK the material has mainly
selected because of its international interest. The topics
covered are the sorts of issue which would be
tackled in a university course in the subject.
The entries are short and designed to load quickly. If you would like to know more, there are links to follow, reading lists and a page leading to much longer on-line readings.
This website is one of the most widely used sites in the field of social policy internationally. When I started it up, I had originally intended the pages to be for people who are beginning studies in Social Policy, and those who are thinking about it. Many more people than the original target audience have found the site helpful, and I have received notes from teachers and students around the world. Beyond that, I think it's true to say that the site has done a great deal to shape people's understanding of what Social Policy is about. My textbook explains, in greater detail, the architecture of the subject; but when I talk to people from different countries about Social Policy as an academic discipline, it's often the website that they're thinking of.
As the range of content, reading and references has increased, the scope of the site has broadened.I have been slowly expanding the references to university-level reading from open access sources. I have added an on-line reading list linked to the subjects covered in Social Policy: Theory and Practice. The level of detail is necessarily less than a textbook would include, however, and students should be complementing what they read here with a range of other sources.
The site first
came on line in May 2000. It was based at the University of Dundee, and
was transferred to the Robert Gordon University in September 2001.
Since July 2015 the site has been hosted
independently on my own domain.
The most popular page is the one on comparative social
accounting for over 10% of views and taking readers 4 minutes to read
Internet domains often disguise the country of origin, but about a
half the users come from the UK. Of the remainder, the principal
users are in the USA, Canada,
Australia, the European Union, South Africa, India and China. Since I
moved the site in July 2015 there have been users from 205 countries.
The author of these pages is Paul Spicker. The site is intended as an educational resource, and the pages are meant to be freely accessible, but the author retains copyright. No material in whole or in part from these pages may be modified, copied, reproduced, re-published, uploaded, posted, or distributed in any way. Subject to that, you are granted limited personal non-exclusive use of the materials within these pages, provided appropriate recognition of the origin of the materials is made.
Teachers are granted permission to make paper copies of text
for use by their students, provided that
Teachers who wish to use material from the site for their students on their own websites are asked to link to the material on this site rather than copying text from it into their own files. Please do not copy material from this site onto other sites with public access. That leads to internet searches sending people to old or outdated files which I cannot correct.
Please consult with the author about other uses.
I have had to put up the copyright message because of abuse. Some "cheat sites" have duplicated text from this website and are offering it for sale. It is unlikely that anyone who has found their way to this website would consider paying anyone for the material they can get here for free. I have no connection with these sites, and I have not endorsed or granted permission for any of the work contained on these pages to appear on such sites. Submission of information contained within these pages to such sites will be treated as an infringement of copyright.
Many relevant graphics are unavailable because of copyright restrictions. Copyright resides in the person who makes the image, not the person represented. This means, for example, that a public domain image is available of Winston Churchill, who died in 1965, but not of John Maynard Keynes, who died in 1946. The rights to use different images are consequently complex. Copyright acknowledgements are given next to the images; images that are out of copyright are generally noted as such in the ALT text, which is visible when the mouse pointer hovers over the picture.
People who want to refer to the pages should cite them in the usual way. Common conventions for internet citations have not been established, but an appropriate reference might be something like this:
P Spicker, 2016, An introduction to social policy, www.spicker.uk [give date of access].
The date when the file was last updated can be found at the foot of each page.
Students who are using this site need to understand that it is not acceptable in any academic institution to copy out the material without acknowledging the source, even if you change some of the words. That would give the impression that you had read, selected and ordered the material yourself. Plagiarism takes in more than "copying"; it is the act of passing off other people's work as one's own. This happens
On the site you will also find further guidance on writing essays. It was included in a previous edition of my book Social Policy.
The format of the site has been revised more than once, mainly to meet the demands of different browsers and the search engines. The sections have been kept brief, so that they can comfortably be read on a computer screen, and the files are small and mainly text-based to allow rapid access. The main reason for putting several screens together in each file is speed: material can continue to load while people are reading.
The site was initially prepared with Dreamweaver, and currently I may edit the text with Kompozer, but as time has gone on more and more has been done by direct editing. I have largely avoided scripts and more complex coding, because too many things do not work consistently on different devices or browsers, but I have used widgets from other providers, including graphs from Google Public Data Explorer and the Trade Union Congress.
The needs of users have been central to the design. A series of
marginal changes in the appearance of the site conceal some fairly
drastic editing of the source code. Some elements of the layout have
been compromised in order to meet accessibility standards.
There are minor differences in appearance
between browsers, but the style in each should be clear and consistent.
Things have got more complicated with the rise of tablets and mobile phone browsers. It's been a challenge making the site accessible for mobile users, and particularly difficult to get graphics and tables to display well on a four-inch screen. I have cut down file sizes wherever I could; the increase in speed should be noticeable. The files are all small, and they should load rapidly - the largest file, on Social Security, is 35Kb - but any text beyond a couple of paragraphs can seem lengthy on a phone. Please warn me if anything isn't as it should be.
The site statistics were initially collected using my universities' services but since 2009 I am have been using Google Analytics. There have been some interruptions in the collection of statistics, and I have had to prune some figures because of 'referral spam', where robots claim spuriously to have visited sites in order to generate return traffic. When I redesigned the website during the move, it reduced the number of pages a user had to load; the numbers of page views has fallen, but the numbers of sessions and unique users are very similar to the previous year.
Accessibility for people with disabilities were initially checked
with Bobby, an accessibility programme; it
was compatible with their AAA rating. Bobby has now been replaced by WAVE, and the site
has been checked with that. Their main concern is that I have
used many links to external PDFs, because some PDFs are not themselves
accessible; however, online links are necessary for much of what I am
doing, and I have generally signalled the use of such links in the text
rather than adding more detailed guidance to every link.
Given the range of different users, it is difficult to be confident that there are no hidden traps; please report any you find.
The main aim of revision at this stage is to make the site as useful as possible to people studying and working in the field. The coverage is being gradually expanded and refined. In 2015 most of my efforts had to be devoted to transferring the system to a new host, but since then I have gradually added a range of new material - a page on Poverty and several new entries, including those on risk and vulnerability, income and wealth and the end of the Poor Law. I have put a dateline on most pages so that people can see when the most recent revision has been made.
I use my blog on social policy to chart the fine grain of policy; it has allowed me, for example, to chart the progress of social security in the UK in a way I could not have done within the constraints of the main website. I blog two or three times a week, and the blog has had more than 700 entries to date. The blog entries are also mirrored on Twitter (which is shown in the feed below this text) and on RSS. You can also follow the blog by receiving emails or on Wordpress.
This website also has an Open Access page where readers will find five of my books for free, and about 70 of my published papers.
As an Emeritus Professor I maintain the website at my own expense. You can support this work by
Any other comments would be appreciated. Please send suggestions or queries to email@example.com.